When investors and traders first discover the Wave Principle …..

 

When investors and traders first discover the Wave Principle, there are several reactions:

 

  • Disbelief – that markets are patterned and largely predictable by technical analysis alone.
  • Joyous “irrational exuberance” – at having found a “crystal ball” to foretell the future.
  •  And finally the correct, and useful response – “Wow, here is a valuable new tool I should learn to use.” 

 

Just like any system or structure found in nature, the closer you look at wave patterns, the more structured complexity you see. It is structured, because nature’s patterns build on themselves, creating similar forms at progressively larger sizes. You can see these fractal patterns in botany, geography, physiology, and the things humans create, like roads, residential subdivisions… and – as recent discoveries have confirmed – in market prices. 

 

Natural systems, including Elliott wave patterns in market charts, “grow” through time, and their forms are defined by interruptions to that growth.

 

Here's what I mean by that. When your hands formed in the womb, they first looked like round paddles growing equally in all directions. Then, in the places between your fingers, cells ceased growing or died, and growth was directed to the five digits. This structured progress and regress is essential to all forms of growth. That this “punctuated growth” appears in the financial markets is only natural. As Bob Prechter, the world's foremost Elliott wave expert, says, “Everything that thrives must have setbacks.”

 

The first step in Elliott wave analysis is identifying patterns in market prices. At their core, wave patterns are simple; there are only two of them: “impulse waves,” and “corrective waves.” Impulse waves are composed of five sub-waves and move in the same direction as the trend of the next larger size. A corrective wave follows, composed of three sub-waves, and it moves against the trend of the next larger size. As the picture below shows, these two patterns form similar structures of larger sizes, or “degrees,” as R.N. Elliott, the discoverer of the Wave Principle, called them:

 

 

The above pattern begins with waves 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 that together form wave (1) – a five-wave, impulsive structure that tells us that the trend at the next larger degree is also upward. If you were reading this in real-time, and the rest of the pattern was not visible, it would also warn you to watch for a three-wave correction.

 

Corrective wave (2) in the chart above is followed by waves (3), (4), and (5), to complete an impulsive sequence one degree larger – labeled 1 circled, sometime written as ((1)). This is followed by a three-wave correction of the same degree; wave ((2)).

 

One way to think about corrective waves is that because they move against the next larger trend, they lack the strength to unfold into a full five-wave move. Whatever the reason, the fact that they are weaker than the impulse waves creates that necessary "interruption" I mentioned earlier and causes the progress and regress that defines nature’s growth structure.

 

Have a look at this next chart of an actual market, the U.S. Dollar Index. (See this chart fully labeled in the February 18 Short Term Update; online now).

 

 

Well, that's the gist of it. Congratulations, you've begun learning the basics of Elliott wave analysis! Stay tuned for the Part II article in this five-part series, where we'll address the labeling of wave patterns in real time and show you how to use this valuable tool in your trading. 

In the first article of this series, you learned the basics of Elliott wave patterns. Now let’s take a look at how we can (or can't) identify completed wave structures in order to see where the market is within a larger pattern (or trend). Then we’ll use the Three Rules of Elliott to decide where it is likely to go, and use "alternate counts" to order the probabilities. 

Impulse waves are the most readily identifiable waveform. Like the main current in a river, they are relatively smooth and laminar. But corrective waves are more like eddies along a riverbank, complex and tricky, swirling back against the current.

 

Below is a chart of an impulsive five-wave move up that completes a larger-degree impulse wave (1). It is followed by a three-wave move down within what is probably a larger corrective wave (2). This is our "working," or preferred count – the scenario most likely to be correct. 

 

 

We know that wave (1) is complete. How? Because we see that a) its internal structure shows clear five waves of a smaller wave degree, and b) it is followed by a three-wave correction. But do we know that the corrective wave labeled (2) is complete?

 

The fact is we are not certain. But we can assign various probabilities to whether or not it's complete. That’s what Elliotticians call alternate wave counts, shown at the bottom as Alternate (A) and (B). Alternate counts are essential to using the Wave Principle properly. They are not "failed predictions," or "bad" pattern interpretations. Alternate counts allow you to narrow down the infinite number of ways the market can move to just two or three AND rank these probabilities from highest to lowest. That makes your trading or investment decisions a whole lot easier.

 

 

So, now that we see in the chart above that corrective-looking three-wave decline labeled ABC (that comprise the larger-degree wave 2), here are the three most likely possibilities – ranked in order of highest to lowest:

 

Most Likely: Wave (2) has ended and wave (3) is about to begin a strong upward move.

Less Likely: Wave (2) has not ended, and could develop into a more complex three-wave structure (which would still not change the preferred count).

Least likely: If Wave (2) continues much lower, retracing all of wave (1), the alternate count will become preferred: Waves (1) and (2) are then most likely waves (A) and (B) of an upward correction within a larger impulsive downtrend. That's what the labeled "Alternate (A) and (B)" count in the above chart shows.

 

Despite this seeming uncertainty, you will like the next part. Although the three alternate counts describe different scenarios, the implication of each – if you think about it – is the same: The larger trend is higher, so the market is likely to move upward! So, as you can see, a careful look at your alternate wave counts can quickly lead you to an actionable trading strategy.

 

You should always remember that only time can reveal the exact wave pattern. There can never be 100% certainty about the position of the market, but Elliott’s three specific rules limit the probabilities to a number you can work with – so you know when your primary count is valid, and when you should change to your alternate. The rules are: 

Rule One: Wave 2 can never retrace more than 100% of wave 1.

Rule Two: Wave 3 is often the longest and never the shortest among waves 1, 3 and 5.

Rule Three: Wave 4 can never end in the price territory of wave 1.  

The Three Rules of Elliott give you specific boundaries for any wave count. In the chart above, for example, if wave (2) continues below the start of wave (1), thus violating Rule #1, then your originally preferred count would be instantly invalidated, and one of the alternates becomes preferred. These rules help eliminate subjectivity, define your strategy, reduce your risk – and give you an instant edge in the markets.

 

In Part III, we will look at how Fibonacci ratios help you forecast the markets. In the meantime, our website is full of educational material: check out our Education, Traders and Free Stuff pages. 

 

 

 

In the first article of this series, you learned about the basics of Elliott wave patterns. The second article introduced you to "alternate counts" and ways to identify the market position in the wave pattern. This article is about the Fibonacci sequence and the ratios within the sequence that guide the shape of Elliott waves. These ratios help traders establish support, resistance, and other price targets in the market.

 

Leonardo Fibonacci of Pisa was the most important mathematician of the Middle Ages. In 1202, he wrote a landmark book on arithmetic, which popularized the decimal and Hindu-Arabic numbering system that we use today. In that book he referred to an additive numeric sequence derived from the growth of a population of rabbits, known to us as the Fibonacci sequence.

 

The Fibonacci sequence begins with 1 and 1 (two love struck rabbits) and then progresses by adding each number to the one before it: 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89 – and so on. What is important to us as Elliott wave students is not so much the numbers themselves as the ratios between them.

 

As the Fibonacci sequence progresses, the ratios between adjacent numbers approach closer and closer to .618 – or its inverse, 1.618 (depending on which of two adjacent numbers you divide by). The ratios between alternate numbers in the sequence are approximately .382, and 2.618. In fact, the nature of this additive sequence is such that you can start the sequence with any two numbers, and the ratios will rapidly approach .618. Try these examples with a calculator. For a fascinating list of phenomena relating to the Fibonacci sequence, consult chapter 3 of Prechter & Frost's Elliott Wave Principle – Key To Market Behavior (EWP)*.

 

Phi (.618034…; don't confuse with Pi) is an irrational number called the Golden Ratio. This ratio exists throughout nature – in population growth patterns, in the DNA helix, in plants, in the structure of the human brain, and in spiral structures from seashells to galaxies. R. N. Elliott's stunning discovery (made in the 1930s, without a computer) was that this universal growth pattern found also shows up in stock market chart patterns. To Elliott, this could only mean that, "man's collectively expressed emotions are keyed to this mathematical law of nature." (EWP)

 

R. N. Elliott was the first person to use Fibonacci analysis in financial markets. The correct usage of it can only be done within a valid Elliot wave interpretation. Many non-Elliott analysts try to find Fibonacci proportions between market moves that are unrelated to each other in any way, making the approach appear far less valuable than it is when you view the markets through the Elliott wave prism.

 

Elliott had two main observations about Fibonacci relationships within waves.

 

One: Corrective waves tend to retrace a Fibonacci proportion of impulse waves of the same degree. Frequent relationships between these waves are 38%, 50%, and 62%. (See the chart from the previous article.)

 

Two: Impulse waves of the same degree within a larger impulse sequence tend to be related to each other in Fibonacci proportion. (See the chart below.) At large degrees of trend these relationships usually occur in percentage terms. At small degrees, the number of points in each impulse wave reveals the ratios.

 

 

These Fibonacci relationships occur in numerous ways in wave patterns, from the numbers of waves in a pattern, to their relationships to each other – and even, in some cases, the relationship between time-spans of waves.

That wraps up a brief introduction to the fascinating world of Fibonacci. Stay tuned for Part IV of the series, where we'll show you how to establish investment strategy and reduce risk in your trading using Elliott wave analysis. In the meantime, you can help yourself by studying the Prechter & Frost's classic text, Elliott Wave Principle*.

 

 

 

In Part I of this series, you learned about the basics of Elliott wave patterns. Part II introduced you to "alternate counts" and ways to identify the market position in the wave pattern. Part III talked about the Fibonacci sequence and the ratios within the sequence that guide the shape of Elliott waves. Part IV showed you how to use Elliott to establish investment strategy and reduce risk.

 

This is the last article in the series, and it covers the ways you can take advantage of the Wave Principle in trading.

 

If you remember, in this real-time coffee chart that you saw in Part IV, we expected wave 2 to retrace one of these common Fibonacci ratios of wave 1 (in order of probability): approximately 5300 (62%; most probable), 5500 (32%) and 5400 (50%). That would be the preferred Elliott wave count; after reaching one of those targets, you would expect wave 2 to end.

 

 

Once the price stalled near a Fibonacci point and started to reverse, you could decide that wave 2 is ending and wave 3 to the upside is about to start – a nice bullish opportunity. The most likely entry point would be near the end of wave 2 – of course, only after you've observed five waves up in 1 and three waves down in 2, the definition of a completed Elliott wave sequence.

 

But what if the price falls substantially below the 62% point at 5300? Then probability shifts away from the preferred, bullish wave count. The good news is that you know that wave 2 cannot go past the beginning of wave 1 (just under 5000) – the First Rule of Elliott says that wave 2 cannot retrace more than 100% of wave 1, remember? That’s the point where you know that your bullish “one-two” wave interpretation is wrong and it’s time to switch to an alternate count (we covered those in Part II) – if you haven't already done so.

 

There are several other ways for you to take advantage of the Three Rules of Elliott and Fibonacci retracements. If you're a shorter-term investor, you might decide to take advantage of each of the sub-waves of waves 1 and 2. For example, as you watch wave 1 top, you know a 38% retracement is the most likely minimum downside potential for wave 2. You could short the market accordingly, watch for an acceptable a-b-c pattern unfold to the downside and signal the end of wave 2, close the short position and prepare to catch the expected rally in wave 3.

 

The chart below zooms in on an even shorter time frame and shows the action in the same Coffee that followed the “one-two” preferred count we’ve been working with. You can clearly see the reversal at the wave 2 low and the impulsive action that followed. From the end of wave 2, you could have confidence to expect a rally in wave 3 – well beyond the top of wave 1:

 

 

I’d like to leave you with one last thought. Because Elliott waves develop exactly the same way in bull and bear markets, if you “flip” upside down every chart you’ve seen in these series of articles, you would be looking at the same opportunities, but to the downside. Neat, eh?

 

That wraps up this series, a brief introduction to trading and investing with the Wave Principle. Once you learn this discipline, you will learn to establish a coherent investment strategy and reduce risk in your trading. To continue your studies, there are several good options. The best one is Prechter & Frost's classic text, Elliott Wave Principle – Key To Market Behavior*.